This one came back to bite me again, so time to note it down here - when running any test code which accesses a SharePoint web or site using new SPSite(url) in a console application, or in a Visual Studio 2010 test project, it is necessary to adjust the build properties of the project.
The project build configuration (the second tab down in the project properties) need to have the Platform Target explicitly set to x64. If this target is set to x86, or possibly to "Any CPU" then the call to "new SPSite" will fail with "FileNotFoundException", stating that "The web application cannot be found". Next time I'll remember...
Tuesday, October 25, 2011
Wednesday, October 19, 2011
Error in Visual Studio 2010 Packaging a SharePoint 2010 Solution
Was getting an error stating that a file "deploys to the same package location" when packaging a SharePoint 2010 solution in VIsual Studio 2010.
Turns out that the SharePointProjectItem.spdata file (in the module subfolder within the Visual Studio project) had somehow gained duplicate entries for a particular file.
To fix this,
Turns out that the SharePointProjectItem.spdata file (in the module subfolder within the Visual Studio project) had somehow gained duplicate entries for a particular file.
To fix this,
- Unload the project in VS (or close the entire solution)
- Find the SharePointProjectItem.spdata file in Windows Explorer, and edit in Notepad++ (or your favourite text editor!) to remove the duplicate reference
- Reload the project in VS, and select that "Package" action - all then worked for me.
Thursday, September 29, 2011
Cannot Log in with Microsoft Lync
Took a while to track this one down - a fresh install of Lync refused to connect or login to Office 365. Experimented with adjusting the manual configuration settings as suggested by lots of posts, but to no avail. Finally found a comment on a forum suggesting to check the time on the computer. The time was in fact a few minutes fast - so I set the time, restarted Lync, and login worked straight away. Who'd have thought?!
Tuesday, September 13, 2011
Cant Seem to Remove Columns from a Content Type in a Solution
Some behaviours in SharePoint 2010 solutions have become frustrating compared with SharePoint 2007 solutions. One that's particularly troublesome is attempting to modify site columns in a custom content type that inherits from a non-built in content type.
When inheriting from a publishing article page content type using a solution, just can't seem to remove a couple of site column. Neither of the following approaches seems to work. If I come up with a solution, I'll add it hear.
<FieldRef ID="{d3429cc9-adc4-439b-84a8-5679070f84cb}" Name="ArticleByLine" Hidden="TRUE" />
<RemoveFieldRef ID="{d3429cc9-adc4-439b-84a8-5679070f84cb}" Name="ArticleByLine" />
When inheriting from a publishing article page content type using a solution, just can't seem to remove a couple of site column. Neither of the following approaches seems to work. If I come up with a solution, I'll add it hear.
<FieldRef ID="{d3429cc9-adc4-439b-84a8-5679070f84cb}" Name="ArticleByLine" Hidden="TRUE" />
<RemoveFieldRef ID="{d3429cc9-adc4-439b-84a8-5679070f84cb}" Name="ArticleByLine" />
Shrinking the SharePoint Log FIle (for dev machines)
Found some useful information on taming a large log file - useful on a SharePoint development machine.
To shrink log files in sql server 2008, first change the recovery model of database to simple, then shrink the log file and finally change back to the previous recovery model. Here is the SQL:
USE dbname;
To shrink log files in sql server 2008, first change the recovery model of database to simple, then shrink the log file and finally change back to the previous recovery model. Here is the SQL:
USE dbname;
GO
-- Truncate the log by changing the database recovery model to SIMPLE.
ALTER DATABASE dbname
SET RECOVERY SIMPLE;
GO
-- Shrink the truncated log file to 1 MB.
DBCC SHRINKFILE (2, 1); -- here 2 is the file ID for trasaction log file,you can also mention the log file name (dbname_log)
GO
-- Reset the database recovery model.
ALTER DATABASE dbname
SET RECOVERY FULL;
GO
Thanks to an answer by RTTAdmin on the MSDN forums for that suggestion.
Monday, September 12, 2011
SharePoint 2010 Timer Job Journey of Discovery - Updating Web App Properties
So there I was, creating a SharePoint 2010 Timer Job to retrieve and aggregate tag information from the Social Data Service. Using a pattern that worked well in SharePoint 2007, the feature receiver in the solution was tailored to save information for each execution of the job to the property bag of the web application.
But the timer job failed to register when activating this solution through the features admin page on the site. The event log showed an "Access denied" SecurityException error, occuring in the call to SPWebApplication.Update(). The code was simply attempting to set a web application property at that stage.
Time passes... Lots of experimentation and research.... Finally discovered the cause is related to applying least privileges access to accounts on the server install. The account under which the feature gets activated when clicking on "Activate" in the browser UI does not have sufficient rights to make changes in the configuration database. And web application property bag settings seem to be saved to the configuration database rather than to a content database (makes sense, I guess, as a web app can be associated with multiple content databases).
The solution therefore is to activate the feature using PowerShell whilst logged in with an account having update rights on the config database - for instance, using the setup account (which you used during installation, of course, didn't you?!)
But the timer job failed to register when activating this solution through the features admin page on the site. The event log showed an "Access denied" SecurityException error, occuring in the call to SPWebApplication.Update(). The code was simply attempting to set a web application property at that stage.
Time passes... Lots of experimentation and research.... Finally discovered the cause is related to applying least privileges access to accounts on the server install. The account under which the feature gets activated when clicking on "Activate" in the browser UI does not have sufficient rights to make changes in the configuration database. And web application property bag settings seem to be saved to the configuration database rather than to a content database (makes sense, I guess, as a web app can be associated with multiple content databases).
The solution therefore is to activate the feature using PowerShell whilst logged in with an account having update rights on the config database - for instance, using the setup account (which you used during installation, of course, didn't you?!)
Thursday, August 11, 2011
Secure Store Application Error 8306
After much experimenting on the SharePoint 2010 server, following tips on the "Claims to Windows Tokens Service" and the settings of the SecurityTokenServiceApplication web service site, finally found that the 8306 error being frequently logged was due to Forms Authentication being enabled in the SecurityTokenServiceApplication web service site. Disabling Forms Authentication removed the issue on the Secure Store Service Application management page in Central Admin
To check this setting, open IIS Admin, browse in the left-hand pane to Sites > SharePoint Web Services > SecurityTokenService Application, and in the IIS section in the right-hand pane open the "Authentication" settings. Only "Anonymous Authentication" and "Windows Authentication" should be enabled.
The 8306 error in the event log was : "An exception occurred when trying to issue security tokens". Thanks to the threads at http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/sharepoint2010setup/thread/49508c3a-e44b-4b3a-ad94-0e9957b9e025/ and http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/sharepoint2010setup/thread/580a6e7a-e26e-47aa-a6d8-51563b7d27de/ for the final bit of assistance in tracing this one.
To check this setting, open IIS Admin, browse in the left-hand pane to Sites > SharePoint Web Services > SecurityTokenService Application, and in the IIS section in the right-hand pane open the "Authentication" settings. Only "Anonymous Authentication" and "Windows Authentication" should be enabled.
The 8306 error in the event log was : "An exception occurred when trying to issue security tokens". Thanks to the threads at http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/sharepoint2010setup/thread/49508c3a-e44b-4b3a-ad94-0e9957b9e025/ and http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/sharepoint2010setup/thread/580a6e7a-e26e-47aa-a6d8-51563b7d27de/ for the final bit of assistance in tracing this one.
Monday, June 20, 2011
Watch your Ports When Configuring AAMs
Found (the hard way) that SharePoint 2010 is not happy when an Alternate Access Mapping is configured with a port on the public URL that is different than the port on the corresponding Internal URLs.
For an extranet I was creating using SharePoint Foundation 2010, we were using port 80 on the external-facing side of the firewall. The firewall was redirecting those calls to port 81 on an internal IP address. So I had setup the extranet zone in AAM to have [some site]:80 as the public URL, and [some internal ip address]:81 as an Internal URL in that same zone.
[Various reasons for not using host headers in this instance, and for using port 81 for the SharePoint web app!]
Could access the site inside the firewall, but failed to get to the SharePoint pages from outside. Much analysis using Fiddler and the MS Network Monitor 3.4 (great tool, that one - really easy parsing of results) revealed that something was redirecting the client from [some site]:80 to [some site]:81 for the external calls. Still don't know whether IIS or SharePoint was responsible for this - just know that by changing the firewall to pass through on port 81, and calling [some site]:81 from outside, then all was well again.
So what I learnt today - don't mix ports across AAM internal and external URLs
For an extranet I was creating using SharePoint Foundation 2010, we were using port 80 on the external-facing side of the firewall. The firewall was redirecting those calls to port 81 on an internal IP address. So I had setup the extranet zone in AAM to have [some site]:80 as the public URL, and [some internal ip address]:81 as an Internal URL in that same zone.
[Various reasons for not using host headers in this instance, and for using port 81 for the SharePoint web app!]
Could access the site inside the firewall, but failed to get to the SharePoint pages from outside. Much analysis using Fiddler and the MS Network Monitor 3.4 (great tool, that one - really easy parsing of results) revealed that something was redirecting the client from [some site]:80 to [some site]:81 for the external calls. Still don't know whether IIS or SharePoint was responsible for this - just know that by changing the firewall to pass through on port 81, and calling [some site]:81 from outside, then all was well again.
So what I learnt today - don't mix ports across AAM internal and external URLs
Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Refinement Filtering in the SharePoint Search URL
The refinement filter querystring is the "r" term in a search result page URL. An example of its use is
The value of the “r” term in the querystring decodes to
Some documentation (and the links generated by the refiner web part) use a “=” character, but in my experimentation it seemed that only the “:” character would return results. Further research has shown that the “:” (%3A) character denotes a “contains” comparison whereas “=”(%3D) not surprisingly means “equals” (and yet the “equals” operation does not seem to retrieve any results in my trials)
http://intranet/search/pages/phonelist.aspx?k=christchurch&r=department%3a%22Human%20Resources%22
The value of the “r” term in the querystring decodes to
Department:”Human Resources”
Some documentation (and the links generated by the refiner web part) use a “=” character, but in my experimentation it seemed that only the “:” character would return results. Further research has shown that the “:” (%3A) character denotes a “contains” comparison whereas “=”(%3D) not surprisingly means “equals” (and yet the “equals” operation does not seem to retrieve any results in my trials)
Sunday, April 10, 2011
Finding the SharePoint Site Collection URL on the Client
Little tip - if your client-side code needs to know the URL of the site collection hosting a SharePoint page, have a look at the properties of the _spPageContextInfo object in the HTML source of the page.
This JavaScript object is written into each page, and contains useful information about that page. For my requirement, the _spPageContextInfo.siteServerRelativeUrl property contains the value I needed.
Simple Glossary App (Beta) for SharePoint Released
Have just published details of a new simple glossary/theasaurus application for SharePoint - OneStride Define. The idea behind this, and other layers planned for the framework, is to offer a way to layer interactivity and information on top of existing SharePoint pages.
No need to modify pages that already refer to a word that needs to be clearly defined - just add that word to a dedicated list in SharePoint, and any occurrence of that word in published pages or text fields in lists will be linked to the definition. Nice n' simple.
An additional benefit is that the framework and this first "layer" are supplied as sandboxed solutions, meaning that they can be deployed through the browser, run isolated from the rest of SharePoint and are suitable for use in hosted SharePoint (Office 365 here we come!).
This beta will be available until the end of May 2011. Have a look and let me know what you think!
No need to modify pages that already refer to a word that needs to be clearly defined - just add that word to a dedicated list in SharePoint, and any occurrence of that word in published pages or text fields in lists will be linked to the definition. Nice n' simple.
An additional benefit is that the framework and this first "layer" are supplied as sandboxed solutions, meaning that they can be deployed through the browser, run isolated from the rest of SharePoint and are suitable for use in hosted SharePoint (Office 365 here we come!).
This beta will be available until the end of May 2011. Have a look and let me know what you think!
Wednesday, March 2, 2011
Help for Businesses in Quake-striken Christchurch, NZ
Am gathering links to sites and pages dedicated to assisting businesses in recovering and rebuilding in Christchurch, New Zealand - the page is at http://www.smallsteps.co.nz/restart.aspx . If you find any other sites that are of value to our businesses, please let me know through a comment to this post.
If you are interested in seeing Twitter in action in an event like this, search for tweets containing #eqnz.
If you are interested in seeing Twitter in action in an event like this, search for tweets containing #eqnz.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)